Talk:Duin- en Bollenstreek

I've translated part of the site on "Bollenstreek" from the Dutch Wikipedia pages, but added to it and amended it as appropriate. A few issues arose here:

1. I very much prefer an alternative name like "Dune and Flower Area" or "Beach and Flower Area" but I went with a more literal transaltion.

2. It could be "Region", "Area" or "District". I went with "region" because this is the primary translation in Van Dale.

3. There seems to be little about Dutch floriculture on Wikipedia. I think this subject deserves its own page.

4. Wikipedia needs another page dealing with the Bollenstreek in general.

5. What towns exactly are in the Dune and Bulb Region? There is some inconsistency about this between the Dutch Wikipedia article and the Kustgids site. In this article, I decided to take the stricter view of this, following the approach taken in the Kustengids. So Wassenaar and Bennebroek, which are clearly part of a larger Bollenstreek, are not included here.

6. And should Wassenaar, Leischendam and Voorschoten belong here too? Or are they perhaps a separate "south of Leiden" area within the Bollenstreek? The floriculture around these towns seems limited nowadays. Do they think of themselves as being part of the Bollenstreek?

7. This means the area is now neatly, but somewhat artificially, restricted to South Holland. I think another article is needed for the Kennemerland Bollenstreek (ie the towns in North Holland).

8. I wasn't sure where to classify Oegestgeest, Rijnsburg and Katwijk. I included them here. Does anyone disagree?

9. I was unable to find a public domain map of the area, so I've used an historical map. If anyone has a more modern map, feel free to put it in.

10. The history section here is rather weak. If anyone cares to write a history of the area, feel free to add it.

Schildewaert (talk) 08:23, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Duin- en Bollenstreek. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:35, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]