Talk:EMI 2001

Re. the Thomson marketed version: The brochure produced by the company indicated that the camera had what they called "Vidicon à oxyde de plomb" - French for the term "lead oxide vidicon" which was technically what the Plumbicon tubes were, and an early description of same (given Philips' trademark of the Plumbicon name). Thus the Thomson-marketed 2001's did not use Vidicons at all. –Wbwn (talk) 04:17, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is it truly fair to call it a "very successful" camera? It was an outdated design when it was new, which is one of the reasons why it almost completely failed to sell outside the UK, and even within the UK it was only the BBC's patronage that really made it viable. 91.73.102.49 (talk) 19:56, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The BBC is the largest broadcasting organisation in the world, so I guess the camera's use by them alone makes it 'successful'. Presumably if the camera hadn't been very good they would have dumped them pretty fast and replaced them with something 'better'. As it was, they used them up until 1991. Not a bad record considering the design came out in 1966. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.4.57.101 (talk) 08:37, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on EMI 2001. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080917033538/http://www.tvstudiohistory.co.uk/ to http://www.tvstudiohistory.co.uk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:54, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Could someone explain the "4-way prism"?[edit]

I was puzzled by the 4th channel, in a 3-colour system. Seems there's a higher-resolution monochrome tube, and three lesser ones for colour. http://www.pebblemill.org/blog/emi-2001-keith-brook/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.137.93.171 (talk) 23:58, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Popular Depictions[edit]

The EMI 2001 is an iconic camera. Could it be worth including a section on ‘popular depiction’? The 1976 film ‘Network’ (starring Robert Duvall, Faye Dunaway etc) shows the 2001 being used in a few scenes. NorthYorksChris (talk) 22:20, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]