Talk:Earthjustice

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class because it uses a sub-category of [[Category:Environment]] on the article page.

  • If you agree with this assessment, please remove this message.
  • If you disagree with this assessment, please:
  1. Change the above "class=stub" to "class=start" or another applicable class per Wikipedia:WikiProject Environment/Assessment#Quality scale;
  2. Remove the stub template from the article.

This article reads like a marketing brochure - fooey.[edit]

Of the nine sources cited in the references, seven lead to the website of the organization itself. It's a bit fishy, and I think violates the conflict of interest guideline. Psho (talk) 06:22, 12 July 2010 (UTC)psho[reply]

I started this article and have edited it occasionally since then. I am not now, nor have I ever been, an officer, director, employee, or client of Earthjustice. I can't speak for everyone else who's edited, but I certainly have no conflict of interest.
It's quite common that an article about an organization will lean heavily on that organization's website. Feel free to add additional information from other reliable sources. JamesMLane t c 18:43, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This goes beyond "leaning heavily" and straight into "marketing brochure". Oathed (talk) 01:06, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ZeppoShemp (talk) 17:27, 8 December 2017 (UTC)I agree that this reads like a press release. I have made some wording changes (e.g., "focuses on cases that preserve wildlife and wild lands" I added "as defined by Earthjustice or their associates"). I also cited four sources that are not glowing (two negative/opposition/mixed reactions to Earthjustice policies, and two court rulings they lost). hopefully the whole thing is now a little more NPOV[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Earthjustice. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:37, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]