Talk:East Chinnock
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on East Chinnock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110815101305/http://eastchinnock.com/The-Famous-Salt-Spring.php to http://eastchinnock.com/The-Famous-Salt-Spring.php
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722110911/http://www.bathandwells.org.uk/index.cfm?fuseaction=about.parish&parishid=26354 to http://www.bathandwells.org.uk/index.cfm?fuseaction=about.parish&parishid=26354
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:24, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
"all but rectory"?[edit]
The History section originally read "The Chinnocks were held as one estate in Saxon times by Wynflaed under Shaftesbury Abbey but by the time of the Norman Conquest in 1066 East Chinnock was a separate estate." This was changed in 2020/12/10 to read "The Chinnocks (later East, West and Middle) were in all but rectory in Saxon times lastly owned by Wynflaed under Shaftesbury Abbey but by the time of the Norman Conquest in 1066 East Chinnock was separated." Apart from mentioning the names of the other Chinnocks, I don't see how this is an improvement. In particular, the statement "all but rectory" makes no sense. I'm not even sure what its trying to say. If no-one has any objections, I'll restore the original wording or something similar. Iapetus (talk) 15:14, 9 January 2023 (UTC)