Talk:East Hill Cliff Railway

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Still closed?[edit]

The article says:

The East Hill Lift is currently closed owing to a "control panel fault"[3] in June 2007.

Can anybody confirm that it is indeed still closed. -- chris_j_wood (talk) 16:29, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This was on my ToDo list anyway, so here goes...
...which should keep you busy for a while. :o)
EdJogg (talk) 23:29, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for that, and for sorting out the external links. I've added some clarification, and a cite of the Hastings Observer article. -- Starbois (talk) 10:51, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on East Hill Cliff Railway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:00, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on East Hill Cliff Railway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:08, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on East Hill Cliff Railway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:13, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification of gradient of the line[edit]

The article currently states it to be the steepest funicular in the UK but also states: "Gradient: 38%", which would not be particularly steep for a funicular. As an example, the Lynton and Lynmouth Cliff Railway is described in its own Wikipedia article as having a gradient of 58%, casting more doubt on the 38% for East Hill. Although the length of East Hill is given, the height difference is not stated, so it is not possible from information in the article as drafted to check the gradient. The linked articles from 'The Heritage Trail' and 'Funicular Railways of the UK' both give different values for the gradient (both considerably steeper than 38%); the former states that it is "1:1.28", whereas the latter says "1:1.128". It seems likely given the similarlity in the digits that one of these values contains a typo of either a missing or superfluous digit "1". The "1:1.28" value however corresponds to a gradient of 78% or expressed as an angle, 38 degrees. This in turn suggests to me that the value stated in the Wikipedia article may be incorrectly shown as 38% when perhaps it should be 38 degrees (78%). [The 78% figure is also the once stated at the website https://railtracks.uk/hastings-east-hill-cliff-railway , although that website appears to duplicate the text in this Wikipedia article, so I have no idea whether one has simply been copied from the other.]

I can't find a dedicated website for the line and don't have any other suitable source of information to hand - can anyone else find an authorative source for the gradient? JA 1961 (talk) 20:57, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]