Talk:Eddie Gray (footballer, born 1948)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 21 March 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 23:05, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Eddie Gray (footballer, born 1948)Eddie Gray – clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. This article accounts for around 97% of page views for people named Eddie Gray. He also has far more long-term significance than any other Eddie Gray. Microwave Anarchist (talk) 13:26, 21 March 2021 (UTC) Relisting. ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 02:38, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 12:31, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - pageviews do not make a primary topic, see WP:PPT. Far too many people called Edward/Eddie Gray to merit having a primary topic. GiantSnowman 12:34, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@GiantSnowman: I reject the suggestion that there are too many people with the same name to make this a primary topic. Would you supprt moving David Cameron or Henry Ford or even John Barnes because there are too many other people who share their names. Equally, he wasn't an Edward so there are only 3 or 4 other articles this could apply to anyway, with this Eddie Gray receiving the vast amount of coverage in reliable sources. Microwave Anarchist (talk) 21:05, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I opposed the John Barnes move and still think that was a silly decision. GiantSnowman 21:41, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough, I respect your opinion. Microwave Anarchist (talk) 22:01, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose I feel disambiguation is there for a reason. I agree with GS points. Makes more sense to me anyway. Govvy (talk) 11:16, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.