Talk:Eden Taylor-Draper

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.

Television: Emmerdale Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Emmerdale task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Untitled[edit]

this page has clearly been written by her mother, its hilarious —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.8.215.161 (talk) 14:14, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Belle Dingle.png[edit]

The image File:Belle Dingle.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --20:25, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Date of birth[edit]

As the birthdate in this biography continues to be changed, and as no reliable source has ever been provided for verification, I have removed the date from the article. --Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 22:06, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is absolutely ridiculous that her birth date keeps being changed and removed. The girl was born on 27th October 1997, as stated on her IMDB. THAT IS WHEN SHE WAS BORN - WHY DOES THIS KEEP BEING REMOVED??? - Noxy — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.115.172.138 (talk) 16:42, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It gets removed because the edits fail WP:BLP. --Redrose64 (talk) 16:47, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's funny to look at the edit history of this article to to see verified information repeatedly removed from this article. Apparently posts from verified Twitter posts aren't reliable. Sure - that is your interpretation and you seemingly have nothing better to do with your time than remove information instead of actually contributing content.

It's funny these editors who blindly state certain references aren't reliable, when of course they are 99% of other editors and admins have no problem with them. Amazing that an admin regularly egages in edit wars to push their POV.

Videonasteeez (talk) 17:37, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:BLP, and also WP:NPA. --Redrose64 (talk) 17:41, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and they blindly refer to guidelines that don't back up their claims too. In addition to making no contribution to the article in question or leaving referenced details in place, they run off an try and get another editor to lock the page. Incredible.

Videonasteeez (talk) 17:42, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]