This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
I've just read the badly-argued and sloppily written "article" on the link given, about the supposed identity of Einion Yrth and Uther Pendragon. The site is full of self-published theories passing as "history" and what I've seen of the early Wales-related articles is full of errors, assumptions, half-truths and downright nonsense. This for Rhos, for example: "Initially Rhos was likely to have been part of the territory of the kingdom of Ceredigion. The origin of the name is obscure, but it may have its basis in the former Roman cantref name". Initially part of Ceredigion (founded at the same date, with Gwynedd lying between them!)? As for the name, obviously they don't know it is a common place name element ("moor" etc) and as for "the former Roman cantref of that name", the mind boggles. Absolute bullshit! This link is "original research" at its worst, badly researched, unsourced, etc. I'm removing it as OR and unencyclopaedic. (Here's the original link, for what it's worth). Enaidmawr (talk) 23:42, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
