Talk:Electric Power Research Institute

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electrical engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electrical engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electrical engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Electrical engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Electrical engineeringelectrical engineering articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

moo goes the chicken[edit]

Maybe tone down of the advertisement just a tiny bit? --88.72.223.42 (talk) 09:35, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I did some quick research (based on the recent New York Times article), looked at their recent study, looked at major funding (electric utilities) and slightly re-organized the entry to show their support for so-called 'clean coal', and dismissal of solar and other 'game changing' technologies. I'm not the greatest writer, but its important to note that this group may have a bias in keeping the energy system the way it is, and there is plenty of well documented, scientifically sound controversy surrounding these "clean coal" programs. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.123.160.138 (talk) 18:40, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article reads like a PR puff written by the subject, which I suspect is exactly what it is. Tzq99 (talk) 17:20, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I work for EPRI, and yes, everyone in the power industry likes it the way it is. Bastards are killing 29 million people a year with cancer, destroying the planet, and blaming it on THE END OF DAYS —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.249.104.162 (talk) 02:14, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]