Talk:Elippathayam

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Kerala (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Film: Indian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.
	This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed.

With respects, a revert to former article name....[edit]

While I respect User:Roman Spinner's good faith in his change of article name, and although the guideline at Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English) shares the reasoning behind English titles being preferred, the article name Rat-Trap as changed makes determimation of notability more difficult and not less... and acts against the spirit of the cited guideline... which is intended to make the determination of notability easier for readers.

I did a google search for the article title Rat-Trap and found out all about rat traps... but not the film. As G-News search was even less helpful.
A search for Rat-Trap film for the one Time Out pocket review. Nice, but by itself would not ensure notability.
I did a search for the more accurate translation of The Rat Trap, and found a 1999 film of that name, but not this 1981 film. Again, a G-News search of this name was not helpful.
A search for Elippathayam, the Englification of the Malayam title, immediately found numerous English language sources indicating notability for this film. This same result was with a G-News search for the original title.
Now while I respect the reasoning behind User:Roman Spinner's change of name, and even with the film having been shown in London and having a review in Time Out, the bulk of this films notability is found and searchable under Elippathayam, and not Rat-trap.

With respects, it should be moved back to its original title. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 05:43, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Elippathayam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121001085350/http://www.festival-cannes.com/en/archives/ficheFilm/id/1703/year/1982.html to http://www.festival-cannes.com/en/archives/ficheFilm/id/1703/year/1982.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:06, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]