This article is within the scope of WikiProject Coronation Street, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Coronation Street and its characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Coronation StreetWikipedia:WikiProject Coronation StreetTemplate:WikiProject Coronation StreetCoronation Street articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Having just noticed this page's creation and the similarities to the list entry (which I believe should be recorded somewhere), I'm not too sure whether this page should have been created (or not yet at least). One quick comparison displays that the only difference between the list entry and the article is the addition of an unreferenced "parental developments" section and some storylines. I am therefore proposing that this page be redirected back to the list entry. Unless an article achieves WP:GNG, it should not be created and since this has no expanded development, I strongly disagree that this deserves one. However, I thought it would be best to open a discussion on the talk page first. Soaper1234 - talk 22:06, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Soaper1234: I agree. Perhaps the list entry could be expanded, as Emma is a great character, but certainly not a character that meets WP:GNG, unfortunately. – DarkGlow (talk) 22:41, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I think there is scope for the article to pass GNG. At the time of writing the article is poorly sourced, needs work and offers nothing that cannot be covered in the list entry. This is the problem, it was not created in the correct way.Rainthe 1 20:15, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I definitely believe there is scope for the article, but without the appropriate work and effort being put into it, it should remain a list entry. Soaper1234 - talk 19:09, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
