Talk:Empire of the Sultans

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleEmpire of the Sultans is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 6, 2024Featured article candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 18, 2024.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that most objects in the travelling exhibition Empire of the Sultans bore calligraphy (example pictured)?

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 17:40, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tiles from the Empire of the Sultans exhibition
Tiles from the Empire of the Sultans exhibition

Moved to mainspace by MartinPoulter (talk). Self-nominated at 14:47, 21 November 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Empire of the Sultans; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

Excellent article. New enough (when posted), some excellent images including the hook which is CC-by-SA. Lots of high quality cites. GTG. Maury Markowitz (talk) 15:16, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've marked an unreferenced section. Schwede66 07:55, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Schwede66: The source for that subsection is the source given for the section of which it is part: the appendix of the Khalili book which is ref 45 in the current version. Note that the cited sentence says "a total of sixteen venues" and the sixteen include the thirteen US venues. The same information is available in lots of other places, but it's neater to cite that summary table. How do you want it to be marked in the article that the source for the full section also applies to the subsection? MartinPoulter (talk) 12:30, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I see. I've dealt with it; have a look at my edit. All is good in that case. Reinstating the green tick. The relevant rule is that each section must have at least one reference; that includes sub-sections. Schwede66 19:05, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]