This article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project and talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket articles
There is a toolserver based WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in one big list and in CSV format)
English cricket team in Australia in 2017–18 is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Hi. Here is the previous discussion. The standard of centring the table is used across all tour pages. Per WP:BRD anyone who wishes to change this must dicuss this and gain a consensus to do so. Thanks. LugnutsFire Walk with Me 14:42, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Silence is the weakest form of consensus there is. The tables are centred because one person made a unilateral decision to centre them, and now claims that consistency is a good enough reason to keep doing so, despite no actual reasoning for it other than "I like it". By default, all tables (nay, all content) on Wikipedia is left-aligned; that should not be overridden without a good reason to do so, and the only reason anyone has given so far is an opinion regarding the aesthetics of it. Something more substantial would be nice... – PeeJay 23:35, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Again, I point you to the discussion at WT:CRIC and the discussion at my talkpage with you and Blue Square Thing, which has the following comment :"Either format looks dreadful on a mobile browser in portrait mode, but the same is true of most table (a bullet format works much better if we're considering this as important). On a super-wide desktop monitor with full bowser width, I'd opt for centred I'm afraid PeeJay - sorry; but that's just my eye, I could well be wrong, but I think I'd tend towards keeping tables in whatever format they were first established unless there's an obvious reason not to do so - the "no actual squad" for a home side issue is the most obvious reason to remove them, perhaps". The burden is back with YOU to state why a long-standing consensus should be changed other that you don't like it. Thanks. LugnutsFire Walk with Me 18:16, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
So you're going to conveniently ignore the bit where he said "sorry; but that's just my eye, I could well be wrong"? – PeeJay 18:46, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=logo}
