Talk:Episode 5 (Twin Peaks)

Episode 5 (Twin Peaks) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 4, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 11, 2012.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that scenes in "Episode 5" of Twin Peaks were filmed in Angeles National Forest?

Soap Operas

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera articles

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Episode 5 (Twin Peaks)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TBrandley (talk · contribs) 03:23, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox: Production code?
Didn't add one; to be honest I'm seeing less use for them as I go on. If you think it's important I could dig it up. GRAPPLE X 05:26, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Lede: You need to mention the episode's broadcast and ratings per WP:LEDE
Already there—"First airing on May 10, 1990, "Episode 5" was viewed by approximately 18 percent of the available audience during its broadcast; it has received positive reviews from critics." GRAPPLE X 05:26, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Lede: Federal Bureau of Investigation should be simply "FBI"
Sure? Done. GRAPPLE X 05:26, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Plot: Merge shorter paragraphs where possible
Done. GRAPPLE X 05:26, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Production: Unlink Twin Peaks there per WP:REPEATLINK
Not done, that's the only instance of the link in the article body. GRAPPLE X 05:26, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Reception: "ABC Network" write out fully then have (ABC) upon first mention
Written as "American Broadcast Company" now. GRAPPLE X 05:26, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Reception: A− needs quotation marks around
Got it. GRAPPLE X 05:26, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
References: Why do some references have publishers, and some don't. Choose one method please.
Added. GRAPPLE X 05:26, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

TBr and ley 16:36, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Think I've addressed everything now. GRAPPLE X 05:26, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Passing. TBr and ley 23:07, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Episode 5 (Twin Peaks). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:15, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]