Talk:Europa (rocket)

Spaceflight Mid‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rocketry

	Rocketry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Archives

1

Talk[edit]

I dislike the phrase "total failure". Whilst it is true that no launches were successful, there may have been benefits in terms of technology development and experience gained that were beneficial to the successor organisations. I expect that this was the case (although I don't know for sure).

Moreover, the projects may have also been successfully managed in the other aspects of time and budget. Again, I have no specific knowledge of these aspects.

Future versions of this article should at least be open to this possibility. - User:Matt Whyndham

Let's not forget NPOV as well --GW_Simulations_{User Page | Talk} 21:49, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Main article mentions only 7 failures however the sidebar mentions 4 sucesses and 7 failures, surely the 4 sucesses should be elaborated on in the main article. 83.104.138.141 17:15, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Secret of Apollo[edit]

There is an excellent analysis of the failure of Europa and the ELDO in Stephen Johnson's book "The Secret of Apollo". The book deals with systems management, ELDO being the example of what happens when you don't do it. He points out that the "space race" began with three runners, but ELDO failed so early in the game that it isn't widely remembered today. DonPMitchell (talk) 19:53, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tidbits of History[edit]

Blue Streak, along with the UK's TN weapons, were cancelled after the Nassau agreement in 1960. The US made the UK use their weapons, and Polaris/Trident subs, and in exchange the UK were given exclusive rights to supply all WG Plutonium for the common weapons. The Hanford Reactor, which exclusively made WG Pu, was mothballed in 1970. Blue Streak was then further developed for launching LEO vehicles. The engine is not to be confused with the Wolseley Blue Streak Six. So named because there was always a blue streak of burnt oil coming from the exhaust!220.244.87.218 (talk) 04:25, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Europa (rocket). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120318141852/http://www.britain-in-space.co.uk/1950/blackprince.html to http://www.britain-in-space.co.uk/1950/blackprince.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:34, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]