Talk:Evanna Lynch/GA1
GA Review[edit]
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 17:22, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
In the lead, I don't think this ---> "she is unsure about her future plans" is needed, in my opinion, it fits better in the mainspace than the lead.
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains no original research:
Is "hollywoodnews.com" a reliable source?
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Not that much to do. If the statements above can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck!
- Pass or Fail:
-- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 17:22, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
- I've removed "she is unsure about her future plans" from the lead. I have also removed "and participated in a webcast, to help raise funds for humanitarian aid for the victims of the 2010 Haiti earthquake" from the the 'Personal life' section, because "hollywoodnews.com" is not a reliable source, and although I've tried I have not found a reliable source for it. Thank you very much for the review! Alex Douglas (talk) 09:37, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you to Alex Douglas for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 15:28, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you, kindly. I used some of your FA edits, namely Kirsten Dunst and Maggie Gyllenhaal, as guides when editing this article, so thank you, for that and for the review. I'll continue to work on this article; it's currently being peer reviewed and I'm hoping it'll someday become a featured article. Alex Douglas (talk) 16:44, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you to Alex Douglas for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 15:28, 5 August 2010 (UTC)