Talk:Evington

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comments[edit]

Is Evington A Village Or Suburb ? A village and suburb.

Rowlatts Hill & Goodwood[edit]

This appears to be a personal description, which is not what Wikipedia does. It is worthwhile having information about these parts of the Evington ward, but please find reliable secondary sources that give the information you wish to include and reference them. Otherwise the text will have to be deleted. Why not register as a Wikipedian and help with our Leicestershire projects? Chemical Engineer (talk) 16:37, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template[edit]

I culled this from a page of different town. That page has the "Good Article "status. Page for Evington contains most of the information that would come under the headings below. However, use of this template would improve the layout of the article. Thanks.Jonathansammy (talk) 18:06, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

History[edit]

Toponymy[edit]

Governance[edit]

Early history[edit]

Geography[edit]

Geographic Location

Demography[edit]

Population change[edit]

Economy[edit]

Transport[edit]

Religion[edit]

Culture, education media and sport[edit]

Public services[edit]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Evington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:08, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Evington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:52, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Goodwood link[edit]

This just links back to this article. Valetude (talk) 22:42, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Umar Mosque[edit]

This is certainly not in Evington, but in Evington Valley. The introduction explicitly says Evington Valley is not considered part of Evington.--193.40.12.10 (talk) 20:41, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinates[edit]

I don’t think {{geodata-check}}

The following coordinate fixes are needed for


64.188.186.80 (talk) 05:11, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't said what you think is wrong with the coordinates in the article, and they appear to be basically correct. (I've tweaked them a bit to be more centered in the ward.) If you still think that there is an error, you'll need to supply a clear explanation of what it is. Deor (talk) 14:10, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The first time I saw that[edit]

The first 64.188.186.80 (talk) 05:11, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]