Talk:Expansion of the National Rugby League

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fiji?[edit]

I've never heard anyone outside a pub suggest Fiji should enter a team. I really think this page loses credibility by mentioning them in the same breath as more serious bids with websites and administrators in place. Likewise suggesting a bid's home ground is going to be a 10,000 seat ground (Logan) is crazy. If they're seriously proposing a 10,000 seat ground in that state will be their home ground they can save a lot of time and pull the plug now. TBA would be a better entry for this page until the bid team comes up with something better.

Personally I think the "official bids" (with websites and with bid teams employing staff) should be more prominent in the article. Any other "suggested" teams should be at the tail of the article with some citations to news articles mentioning the bid. Thoughts? Tigerman2005 (talk) 13:28, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed Tigerman. I'll start trimming the article down if no-one has any objections? Bongomanrae (talk) 05:39, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Expansion of the National Rugby League. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:57, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

British Bulldogs[edit]

The only reference to this is a single article that is almost 4 years old. It hasn't been mentioned by Koukash since who is now looking at a Cumbrian team instead. There is no progress to speak of. The NRL/ARL has also never even acknowledged the idea and only ever talks about Perth or Brisbane 2. There is no reason to include it on this page, unless we want to include every little passing reference to the most ridiculous ideas. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.254.2.58 (talk) 14:09, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Map[edit]

Needs fixing, half the clubs are in the sea. Mn1548 (talk) 15:52, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]