Talk:Expert (Dungeons & Dragons)

This redirect is within the scope of the Dungeons & Dragons WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dungeons & Dragons-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, or join the discussion, where you can join the project and find out how to help!Dungeons & DragonsWikipedia:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsTemplate:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsDungeons & Dragons articles

D&D to-do:

view

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Merge : Various articles
Stubs : Dungeoneer's Survival Guide, Swords & Spells, Variant Dungeons & Dragons games, More...
Update : Rewrite to be out-of-universe: Companions of the Hall, Dark Sun, Elf (Dungeons & Dragons)
Verify : add sources to novels planned for merge to List of Dragonlance novels
Other : Collaboration: Dave Arneson, Drow (Dungeons & Dragons)

Comments[edit]

Isn't having an entry for a particular class in a particular version of a particular game just a bit of overkill? Can't this be handled under a broader D&D entry?

Also, it doesn't say which version of the game this is true of. I assume AD&D 3rd edition?

Well... 1: NPC classes were introduced in the 3.0 version, yes, but the current version of D&D is 3.5. 2: All information concerning D&D should be of the current version, not counting historical recitings of previous incarnations. Baring those, anything should be considered up to date and true. 3: There is a seperate page for every single D&D class. Why? Because they are all seperate and unique, and grouping them on one page would either make a giant article, or would leave out a large amount of information (which would defeat the purpose of an encyclopedia).