Talk:Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

needs followup[edit]

article only covers the scotus case. then what happened?

i know in 2018 there was a state court decision ona question of what the statute meant, and then it went back to the second circuit. what happened next? is the case final yet? update ok lookslike they workedit out and dismissed. https://www.consumerfinancemonitor.com/2019/01/10/parties-in-case-challenging-constitutionality-of-ny-no-credit-card-surcharge-law-jointly-seek-dismissal-of-complaint-and-appeal/

~~gtbear@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 40.134.103.158 (talk) 03:43, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]