Talk:FIA GT1 World Championship

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

World GT[edit]

If the 2012 World GT was a reorganisation of the current World GT1 series, why did the FIA announce it instead of Ratel? Why isn't the announcement on the official GT1 website? --Falcadore (talk) 05:22, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why it's not on gt1world.com, but it's been well established that this was Ratel's idea and it's still the same series, just with new cars. I do recall there being an interview with him on gt1world.com about the proposal, or possibly some other news site. The359 (Talk) 05:29, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on FIA GT1 World Championship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:43, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]