Talk:Faifley

Intro

Despite having lived in Faifley for a number of my formative years, I cannot bring myself to add anything to this article. This is due to an overwhelming desire to include entries such as "Would be better off as a smoking hole in the ground." Hopefully, the addition of this comment will keep me from such destructive acts and will lead, in time I hope, to my being able to overcome this petty problem, such that I might be able to contribute to the article while keeping within Wikipedia NPOV standards. Gallaghp

If you had written something like that, chances are it would have been removed by someone like me. If Faifley is capable of producing people who are as articulate as yourself, then there must be some sort of hope beyond it being a smoking hole in the ground.Johnnywoo 13:32, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Having Been raised in this "hole" I tend too look at it like the kind of place that you wished had never existed and that no one should have to be raised in. Given that I have subsequently moved and often visit to see friends here. It is still there and looking better than it ever did. Thriving community? Well not any more. But it still gave me the drive and desire to go away and escape from the notoriety assosciated with it and the people. The notoriety isnt aimed at everyone but brushes and tar spring to mind. Take out the junkies and the idiots it would be great. Even now I still see the idiots, that were older than i was then, but idiots all the same when I was growing up. Most people forget that its through memories that we form opinions, but it was the safest place for kids growing up and you could always find someone who knew you and your parents. It possibly still is but I dont stay there any more so I cant really comment

Boab

Gordon

It seems as though someone by the name of Gordon thinks quite well of himself in relation to Faifley. I've reverted the last of his efforts but we should obviously keep an eye on this page for any future vandalism. Gallaghp (talk) 12:45, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Faifley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120322052321/http://www.scrol.gov.uk/scrol/browser/profile.jsp?profile=Population&mainLevel=Locality&mainText=faifley&mainTextExplicitMatch=false&compLevel=CountryProfile&compArea=Scotland&compText=&compTextExplicitMatch=null to http://www.scrol.gov.uk/scrol/browser/profile.jsp?profile=Population&mainLevel=Locality&mainText=faifley&mainTextExplicitMatch=false&compLevel=CountryProfile&compArea=Scotland&compText=&compTextExplicitMatch=null

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:09, 1 December 2017 (UTC)