Talk:Fanatics, Inc.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 26 September 2014 by reviewer MatthewVanitas (talk · contribs).

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Sports

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports articles

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
Requested articles (Sports)
Requested articles (Association football)
Requested articles (Association football women)
Requested articles (Motor sports)
Requested articles (Estonian sportspeople)
Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
Cleanup :
* Sport governing body (this should-be-major article is in a shameful state)
* Field hockey (History section needs sources and accurate information - very vague at the moment.)
* Standardize Category:American college sports infobox templates to use same font size and spacing.
* Sport in the United Kingdom - the Popularity section is incorrect and unsourced. Reliable data is required.
* Fix project template and/or "to do list" Current version causes tables of content to be hidden unless/until reader chooses "show."
Expand : Professional sports (crucial article explaining the salaried undertaking of sports)
* Sport industry (currently a sub-stub)
Photo : for pages listed in Category:Wikipedia requested images of sports and games and sub-categories.
Stubs : work on articles in Category:Sports stubs
Update : List of world sports championships
Other :
- Translate the page of sport in each country from corresponding article in other language Wikipedia to English Wikipedia which was marked in red.
- Categorize: Gather all (major/olympic) sports to be part of this project
- RfCs: answer requests for comment

Mass cleanup[edit]

The article was barely more than a stub, with some random information. I attempted to correct random commentary or anything unsourced. I added sources or expanded in areas I could find sources for. Separated Fanatics differing forays into each sporting league. While each sub-heading is on the smaller side, as further deals go and time passes, these headers will be even more useful, so this move was as much for clarity as for ease of editing in the future. I will further expand to confirm other contracts mentioned in the lede but not in the body, but felt organization was more important first, to make further edits as it read mostly like an advertisement, instead of a Wiki article. Seola (talk) 22:29, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Could some of the content be combined in to something like a merchandise section?[edit]

A merchandise section or similar sections explaining the company's business in the apparel, trading card, NFT, etc. markets followed by the "Other Ventures" section seems more in the scope of the article than its current format.

From an outsider's perspective, it's difficult to understand the relevance of all of the individual sections within the current format of the article and they make it appear as a WP:COATRACK. There doesn't seem to be much, if any, context given or explanation of the historical significance, impact on the company & competitors, etc. provided within the Sports Leagues sections.

Criticism section[edit]

could some of the ongoing quality issues across different product lines, and general concerns/criticism about cost-cutting measures be combined into a criticism section? 24.168.27.85 (talk) 14:16, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reads like a press release[edit]

The article reads as if it is a press release from Fanatics. Benm316 (talk) 21:27, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]