Talk:Fantastic Light/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 19:58, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this tomorrow.♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:58, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox
  • Cite $8,486,957 earnings.
Intro
  • Can you mention when the horse had his debut and when he retired, his last race?
Racing career
  • Please wikilink the other horses, missing or not and all through the article
  • Royal Ascot 1999, date please.
  • 2000 Coronation Cup at Epsom, date please.


Improvements made[edit]

  • Cite $8,486,957 earnings.done
  • debut and when he retired done
  • wikilink the other horses done
  • Royal Ascot and Coronation Cup dated done

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

That's fine. I still though think the prose is a little weak in places which would need to be much improved with further research and content if it is to ever reach FA.♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:03, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]