Talk:Fantasy of manners

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

By the description, it would seem to me that George R. R. Martin's A Song of Ice and Fire series would fit into this genre. But I'm unsure. Does anyone agree? If not, why not? SpectrumDT (talk) 17:49, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, that series is more heroic fantasy; the kind of social punctilio and battle-of-wit that enliven a fantasy of manners are not what Martin's series are about. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:17, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reason for name?[edit]

There's no explanation given at all for why this is called "fantasy" of manners other than one or two sources using the term for no apparent reason whatsoever, and the label appears rather dubious with the total lack of any supernatural elements or violations of consensus reality. Could it be that some mood of surreality, grotesqueness, or social tensions is meant, rather? --79.193.27.76 (talk) 02:00, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Because this is a subgenre of fantasy fiction? --Orange Mike | Talk 19:13, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

how about at least a few examples?[edit]

Hey, I would add examples myself but I don't know any. The list of authors is great but most of them have tons of books and I'm guessing only a few of them are fantasy of manners. So if anyone can do it, please add some examples of works that fall under this category.Gigei (talk) 13:21, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fantasy of manners. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:37, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]