Talk:Fatwa of Ali Khamenei against insulting revered Sunni figures
Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A fact from Fatwa of Ali Khamenei against insulting revered Sunni figures appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 22 June 2019 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
This article was copy edited by Tdslk, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 23 February 2019.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles
As mentioned in the DYK review, it is extremely improbable that there were no dissenting views anywhere in the world regarding this fatwa; this article needs to include something noting such views to better balance the article. Not just for DYK; this is a standard for all of Wikipedia. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:04, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@BlueMoonset:I added some opposite opinions in the article so I removed the tag.M1nhm (talk) 19:33, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
M1nhm, when someone else adds a tag, it's pretty much up to them, or some independent party, to determine whether the neutrality issues have been fully addressed. Sometimes the problem is not only the weight of the opinions, but how they are worded. I'm going to take a quick look now to see whether I believe the article is now neutral. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:44, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
BlueMoonset, The article was copyedite so i thought this section just might has a pov problem, then i did edit, if there is problem in other sections, pleas say me, I will try to solve it. M1nhm (talk)
