Talk:Felixstowe Porte Baby

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Military history: Aviation / British / European / World War I Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War I task force

Name[edit]

The type appears to have been known as the Porte F.B.2 and later acquired the name Porte F.B.2 Baby as far as I can see it was never known as as the Felixstowe Porte Baby at the time. It was a pre-requisite of the Felixstowe family which started with the F.1. Should we rename the article? MilborneOne (talk) 14:57, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think CommonName might be appropriate even if contemporaneously it was known as something else. What do the modern sources call it - as the article title, just 'Porte Baby', something else entirely? GraemeLeggett (talk) 21:25, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Porte Baby appears to be the common name at the time. Modern sources may just copy Wikipedia! MilborneOne (talk) 21:46, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(ec) Peter London's British Flying Boats (2003) calls it the Porte Baby, sometimes with 'Baby' in quotes. Thetford's British Naval Aircraft since 1912 (1978) calls it the Porte Baby. Jack Bruce's article in Flight (1954) generally calls it the Porte Baby, although noting that it was officially designated F.B.2.Nigel Ish (talk) 21:49, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Felixstowe Porte Baby. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150813053311/http://crashsiteorkney.com/page36.htm to http://www.crashsiteorkney.com/page36.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:30, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]