Talk:Fiat Marea

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Removed[edit]

"Problems can occur with dashboard illumination but in typical Fiat style a hard thump on the control which isn't illuminated usually solves the problem." removed b/c "Wikipedia surveys existing human knowledge; it is not a place to publish new work. Do not write articles that present your own original theories, opinions, or insights." :) WP:YFA Emuka 11:44, 22 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't even true. There is one illumination circuit on the dash period. Therefore hitting the "control" won't change that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.214.7.110 (talk) 11:46, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
False. I drive Fiat Marea Weekend 1.8 16v (2000), have the same problem with dashboard lights, precisely with air direction switch, a mild thump on it solves the problem. And each of the switches (temperature, air speed and air direction) has it's own circuit and lights. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Medjed (talkcontribs) 20:48, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revised[edit]

Hello. I've revised this a little, updated the grammar etc etc. I've also checked on the FIAT Brazil website and I've updated the engines/specs. Feel free to add PS aswell as kW and bhp.

Just thought it'd be a bit clearer.

Abarthaddict 06:07, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You[edit]

After I'd tidied this article up a bit, I noticed someone's formatted my information better, but with a few mistakes grammatically - but, I have to say, whoever did that made the article easier to read. Thanks!

Abarthaddict 17:04, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tailights[edit]

I do not believe the tailights where taken from Lancia Lybra simply because this car never was present in the brazilian market and the team that changed the Marea tailights were from Brazil. It´s improbable that that was the case. This Lancia Lybra is completely unknown to the brazilian market. The tailights are only concidentaly similar. By the way, how many tailights are almost identical? Many... Lots... Regards. Loudenvier 17:10, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it may sound crazy to talk to oneself alone but, yes, I think I was wrong: I litle research on the specialized press here in Brazil had brought my arguments to the ground: The tailights from the "new" Marea were taken from the Lancia Lybra. I will uptade the article myself with proper references. Regards Loudenvier 17:21, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You are from Brazil? Esplêndido! (or something) The articles on Brazilian automobiles are in desperate need of an editor well-versed in the Brazilian reality and sources, not to mention Portuguese! See Chevrolet Opala or the, yet non-existent Chevrolet Celta, for starters. If you would be willing to spend some time working on this important area in Wikipedia, I will be glad to help you anyway that I can, and also try to assemble a bigger team! Regards, Bravada, talk - 17:32, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I´m from Brazil. Esplêndido is correct! But it´s not used very much in Brazil, Ótimo is more common (but it less incisive too). :-) I´ve worked on the Marea, Fiat Brava and Opel Tigra articles. I can be of greater use because I can translate (read) portuguese since it´s obviously my mother tongue :-), and I´m also a litle bit enthusiastic about automobiles and wikipedia. Just keep a watch on my edits, because they desperately need some copy-edit because my english is not as good as I wish it was. Regards Loudenvier 20:00, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Compact Sedan Popularity[edit]

Having just had a brief read through the Marea article, I noticed this phrase:

"relatively low popularity of compact sedan cars in Europe"

Though I believe this is true, especially in western Europe, certainly some if not most of Eastern European consumers 'prefer' a saloon variant of a car to a hatchback - and I wouldn't be too surprised to learn that the Marea/Bravo/Brava relationship was the same. So should the above quote be changed, to suit both Eastern and Western Europe, or left unchanged to represent the general trend towards hatchbacks? Tp271 (talk) 00:03, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Fiat Marea. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:38, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Fiat Marea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:25, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]