Talk:Field Trip (The X-Files)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Grapple X (talk · contribs) 23:30, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

Last episode of this season to need reviewed.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   "hallucinogenic episodes wherein nothing is quite as it seems" -> "in which nothing is quite..."
   "Whilst taking a shower she thinks she is hallucinating and sees images of a yellow gooey substance running down the walls in the shower but shakes it off." -> This seems a bit run-on. Could it maybe be split a little?
   "Scully stays to perform more testing on the remains." -> either "perform more tests" or "continue testing" would be better.
   "The coroner then informs Scully that he believes that this is a ritualistic killing with boiling of the bones in an acid to remove the flesh, the theory Scully had originally believed to explain the remains of Angela and Wallace." -> Again, this is a bit unwieldy. Try "The coroner then informs Scully that he believes the death to be a ritualistic murder, in which the victim's flesh was removed with acid or by boiling. This is the theory Scully had originally advanced to explain the remains of Angela and Wallace".
   "the mushrooms they broke caused an LSD-type trip" -> "the mushrooms they broke induced strong hallucinations"
   " Bruce Wayne's "Sanctum sanctorum" " -> Isn't this just the Batcave? I couldn't stomach the Batusi long enough to watch the 60s series.

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

   I've fixed refs 1 and 10 to use an en-dash (–) instead of a hyphen, just remember to use those for page ranges. Everything else is grand.

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

   Grand.

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

   Not a bother.

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

   Fine by me.

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   Images used here are grand; though I'm wondering if maybe File:Roma15.jpg would be useful, as it depicts a body farm in use. Up to you to see if you want it in there, I guess.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Shouldn't take long to sort this one out. Get working on the season article and I'll try to get it reviewed promptly for you. GRAPPLE X 23:30, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

OK, I believe I've fixed all the issues. Thanks a ton for reviewing this!--Gen. Quon (talk) 00:02, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Looks good to me. Ready to pass this one. Now get moving with the parent article! GRAPPLE X 00:27, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Will do!--Gen. Quon (talk) 00:34, 8 April 2012 (UTC)