Talk:Final Fantasy X/X-2 HD Remaster/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tezero (talk · contribs) 22:34, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, why not; I'll do this one. Beats waiting idly for a call and putting around with neo-Nazis on /pol/ all day. Tezero (talk) 22:34, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Is Otaku Study a reliable source?
One of the sources was missing its publisher; very well formatted otherwise.
I've added a "See also" to the "Games" section; remove it if you want.
Oh, and I've also renamed that section "Content" because of the audio stuff. Again, revert if you wish.
What are dresspheres?
In the Creature Creator, does the player actually capture human/non-enemy NPCs, or just "recruit" them? In other words, main-series Pokémon, or Pokémon Mystery Dungeon?
"more people in the younger generation" - unspecific
"with various people" - whom?
"reassembling the original assets, approvals and part of the redone high-definition data" - confusing
"The gameplay needed to be heavily altered to bring it up to high-definition standards while keeping it faithful to the original releases" - Maybe this is all they say in the original source (haven't checked), but I'd expect them to go more in-depth. The reason I want such elaboration is that I don't see how gameplay changes, especially heavy ones, would be necessary for a cosmetic update.
"It was also successful in North America" - Just the PS Vita version, or both?
Not a big fan of the reviewer-by-reviewer organization style in Reception (creates/exacerbates arbitrary ordering and repetition), but that's fine for GA.

And... that's it. I'll put this on hold; nothing looks too difficult to hammer out. Take a look at one or both of my GANs sometime if you get the chance. Tezero (talk) 22:53, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think I've addressed all the issues, including rewriting and restructuring the Reception section. --ProtoDrake (talk) 08:21, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good to me. I made a grammatical correction and added a link to the often overlooked Pokémon (video game series) article (it might constitute OR to mention this if the source doesn't - I haven't checked if it does - but I'm not about to hold a GA nomination up for that), but I see no further issues. Tezero (talk) 16:39, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]