Talk:Fire Emblem: The Sacred Stones/GA1

GA Reassessment[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
As an article on the Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force/Sweeps list, I am reviewing this article. The article looks good, but there are a few problems. Its two problems are:

A) The last sentence in the "Supports" and "Units" section, some of the parts in the "Setting" section, and the last paragraph in the "Story" section aren't referenced. Also, maybe change the references in the "Setting" section as well.

B) The picture in the "Gameplay" section should possibly be changed to maybe like actual gameplay from Sacred Stones. If it shouldn't be changed, explain why.

I will delist the article in 7 days if the standards aren't met. GamerPro64 (talk) 18:57, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I added references for the Supports and Units section, still need to find references for the Story and Setting. The gameplay picture depicts a gameplay element that is new to the series. I believe it is better to show that than the actual gameplay - which is very similar to the picture in the gameplay section of the previous game. Aether7 (talk) 18:21, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:VG reviews should replace the current reviews table. --Teancum (talk) 23:25, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have noticed that there's no "Development" section. So it should be added. GamerPro64 (talk) 02:23, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Considering this is my favorite game of all time, I am pretty opposed to the delist, especially if only given 7 days. Research takes time. I swapped out an image for one that illustrated the combat, filled out the fair use, etc. Nezzadar ^[SPEAK] 00:13, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

With 7 days on inactivity and no fixes to the problems, I am delisting it. GamerPro64 (talk) 00:23, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]