Talk:Fireman's Fund Insurance Company
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Unttled[edit]
Not disputing the factual accuracy here, but this article does seem a bit like cheerleading. A google search of "fireman's fund controversy" yeilds 90K+ articles, certianly there's more to the story. Cleanup requested as this is basically a bullet point list of things the company has done rather than a written history. --Xyrrus 02:02, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
- How does it looks now? I'm still working on it... for a company with 140 years of history and 4,000 employees it didn't have a very good article. --W.marsh 02:30, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Xyrrus - Not sure what google search was done to yield 90k+ hits on the search term used. Certainly, the word "controversy" is a legal term that is commonly used to define a court case, which insurance companies are always involved in. I do agree that there are other aspects of FF history that should be in the article. Jaywhip 13:50, 10 November 2007 (UTC) Jaywhip
Lots of Changes[edit]
There have been many changes since the last posting. FFIC's profitable divisions are either being sold off or being included into owner Allianz's own portfolio. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nadalotta (talk • contribs) 03:49, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
- Start-Class California articles
- Low-importance California articles
- Start-Class San Francisco Bay Area articles
- Mid-importance San Francisco Bay Area articles
- San Francisco Bay Area task force articles
- WikiProject California articles
- Start-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Start-Class Finance & Investment articles
- Low-importance Finance & Investment articles
- WikiProject Finance & Investment articles