Talk:Floridablanca, Pampanga

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Image copyright problem with File:Seal floridablanca pampanga.png[edit]

The image File:Seal floridablanca pampanga.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --22:37, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tage with Copy Pasted[edit]

I found out from the site http://efloridablanca.com/home/index.php/profile/brief-history was copy and pasted on this page.

Bonvallite (talk) 03:19, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We demand further investigations[edit]

I beg your pardon but you should've not jumped into conclusion without further investigations. The information and history written about Floridablanca,Pampanga Philippines in Wikipedia had been in existence long before the website http://efloridablanca.com/home/index.php/profile/brief-history was created. The http://efloridablanca.com/home/index.php/profile/brief-history was just recently created this year (2011), so how can something that was written 4-5 years ago be a copy of something that was just recently created? Can you further explain this? We are trying to build the history of our town and we rely mostly on interviews with the local historians and stories from elders. Our town does not have much written history and documents due to the fact that it went through many disasters; WWI Spanish Occupation, WWII Japanese Occupation, rise of the "mambubulos" and hukbalahaps who had burned and ruined many town houses that housed written documents of the town history. Mt. Pinatubo Eruption exacerbated the impediments that Floridablancans face when it comes to finding written history/documents. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blm88 (talk • contribs) 21:33, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://efloridablanca.com/home/index.php/profile/brief-history. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Dpmuk (talk) 02:15, 19 December 2011 (UTC) Dpmuk (talk) 02:15, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Given the above comment and the age of this text I thought I'd explain a bit more why I've removed it. Why it's true that we've had the text a long time if you look at the edit that introduced the text (and indeed created the page) there are signs that the text was copied from somewhere, and likely an earlier version of that webpage somewhere. Looking at the raw source of that first edit you're notice that the text has line breaks in it in exactly the same place as the webpage. As wikipedia does not format text in the same way the page was displayed as a wall of text until this was changed a few months later, which also changed where the paragraphs breaks occured. This means that either someone must have copied the text as displayed to that website and then chose to format it identically to the original insertion or they must have copied the raw text in the few months that it was avaliable in that form. Both of these seems highly unlikely to me. It seems much more likely that the website is either a reincarnation of an earlier site or we've both copied from somewhere else. Either way we have a problem and so this text cannot remain. If anyone questions my actions I'm happy for a second opinion to be sought from another experienced copyright editor. Dpmuk (talk) 02:15, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Floridablanca, Pampanga. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:09, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]