Talk:Ford Custom

Automobiles Low‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge Ford Custom 500[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Majority favors merge. Done. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 18:13, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Considering that Custom 500 was basically just an option package on the Custom and there's not much content in either article, how about merging it here? --Sable232 (talk) 00:46, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would agree that the Custom 500 information should be transferred to the Custom page. GTHO (talk) 22:41, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes-merge. Make Custom 300 and Custom 500 subsections but keep everything on ford custom page. HornColumbia (talk) 03:43, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want it merged because people should know the U.S. model and Canadian model have differences (talk) 16:46, 30 May 2011 (UTC) — Preceding Wikipedia:unsigned comment added by Japanesevehicles100 (talk • contribs) [reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Photos[edit]

I've brought this point up previously with other automobile-related pages, and I will here as well. The photographs used to illustrate this article are inappropriate for this article, in that they are customized models and not factory stock depictions of the original car. I believe that -- although certainly (with sourcing) the article can state the car's appeal to customzers -- any pictures used within this article should depict the original car. Whether that's as a police car or taxicab, or family car, the article's picture should show an accurate depiction of the Ford Custom's use: as a bare-bones, no-frills car used by fleets and budget-conscious customers. [[Briguy52748 (talk) 19:14, 17 April 2011 (UTC)]][reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ford Custom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150215071543/http://www.oldcarbrochures.org/Australia-2/Ford/1949-Ford-Coupe-Utility-Brochure to http://www.oldcarbrochures.org/Australia-2/Ford/1949-Ford-Coupe-Utility-Brochure

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:47, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]