Talk:Franchise tag

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Football League, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Football LeagueWikipedia:WikiProject National Football LeagueTemplate:WikiProject National Football LeagueNational Football League articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Someone please post a reference for the numbers listed in the "2007 Exclusive Franchise Player Costs by Position."

Numbers[edit]

Since the vast majority of players get the non-exclusive tag, shouldn't those be the #s used? Samer (talk) 15:40, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Cassel[edit]

Matt Cassel seems to have gotten an exclusive tag, $14M.

As a separate issue, showing the exclusive tag costs for 2009 and the non-exclusive tag costs for 2008 hides the non-exclusive tag costs of 2008. Ideally, we would show the exclusive tag costs for each year and the non-exclusive tag costs can be extrapolated from there (by simply looking at the previous year). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.83.81.178 (talk) 22:39, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How Is It Determined If The Tag Is Exclusive or Non-Exclusive[edit]

I assume this might have something to do with the players contract, but maybe something else determines if an exclusive or non-exclusive tag is used? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.29.113.221 (talk) 05:36, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Franchise tag. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:29, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Convert salaries-table to $millions[edit]

The table is currently in dollars, but the values are all in the millions range and are rounded to thousands. That means every entry has a ",000", which takes up space in a fairly wide table and makes visual distraction from the actual differences among values. Converting to millions of dollars would look a lot cleaner and clearer I think. Any objections? DMacks (talk) 22:17, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That is, either like this or like that. DMacks (talk) 22:31, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

where's the article?[edit]

just looking at this article, i could tell there must be some kind of behind the scenes edit war going on. Click "history" and I see 40,000 characters repeatedly added and deleted. lol.

what is the problem with the 40,000 that keep getting deleted? this article is a weird stub without them.

just my opinion.

69.162.253.10 (talk) 06:08, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I read a little deeper, and the objection with the 40,000 characters seems to be that they're a list? Idk. I think that information has merit and should be listed somewhere. Can't it be spun off into its own article "List of NFL Franchise Tags" or something? I don't agree with the reasoning to delete that information entirely. It could be relevant. It could be information people are coming here to find out. Somebody plz fix this article. 69.162.253.10 (talk) 06:16, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]