Talk:Francisco Villota

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Real name?[edit]

What is this person's real name? What is the story behind the Madonna/Pele-style single name? — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 20:20, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Francisco,his name is Francisco Villota http://www.soitu.es/soitu/2008/08/12/flts11/1218528597_717896.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.53.23.183 (talk) 12:32, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Francisco Villota. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:09, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full name[edit]

According to IOC this person's full name is Francisco VILLOTA BAQUIOLA
See here: [1]
Regards,
--Simy69 (talk) 03:32, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notability[edit]

Perhaps User:BilledMammal could use this talk page to explain why he thinks the subject of this article is not notable. Deb (talk) 07:44, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think notability is not demonstrated, because no significant coverage is provided; the tag requests that editors help to demonstrate the notability of the topic by citing reliable secondary sources that are independent of the topic and provide significant coverage of it beyond a mere trivial mention. Whether they are notable is a different question; there is very little information about many of these early athletes, and it is possible that not enough information exists for it to be possible that they are notable. However, in this case if sufficient information exists I believe they will be notable, due to the novelty of their achievements. BilledMammal (talk) 08:07, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I believe he's probably notable and unlike some Olympians of that era, we can verify more than his name, sport. Sourcing is thin and it isn't a clear cut pass, and these aren't in depth mentions, however the reality is he competed 120 years so we have to be a little lenient vs. an athlete competing today. Some possible options: this book, in Spanish, this one, albeit more about Pelota than VIllota himself. Is this a reliable source when it comes to sports, athletes? If so, it could also work. A merger to the games wouldn't be amiss, but I think rather than re-tagging (per your question on my Talk, @BilledMammal:, you should either take this to AfD if you feel strongly or see whether the sources also mentioned in the article can be further incorporated. Star Mississippi 16:22, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]