Talk:French cruiser Victor Hugo

French cruiser Victor Hugo has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 24, 2020. (Reviewed version).

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Maritime / European / French / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	World War I task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:French cruiser Victor Hugo/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Eddie891 (talk · contribs) 18:01, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this on over today and probably into tomorrow. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 18:01, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments[edit]

"Right elevation and deck plan as depicted in Brassey's Naval Annual 1923" perhaps "Right elevation and deck plan as depicted in Brassey's Naval Annual 1923"?
link Otranto Barrage as the "blockade of the Austro-Hungarian Navy in the Adriatic Sea"?
"reach their designed speed" -> "reach their top speed"? I'm not familiar with such a thing as 'designed speed'
- The speed which the ships were designed to achieve--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:35, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"anti-torpedo boat defense" maybe just "torpedo boat defense"? I don't think the anti- is needed
"was fully committed to building" -> "was committed to building"?
"the ships returned to Jamestown " had they arrived previously?
- Almost certainly, but not explicitly mentioned in the source.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:35, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
our article uses caps for "Naval Review"
- That would only be appropriate if it were a proper name.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:35, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"not the leisurely 6 knots" could do without 'leisurely'?
- No, it's important to emphasize that Léon Gambetta was basically just puttering along.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:35, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"and to rebuild the army" maybe specify what army, or say "rebuild their army"?
"they decided to occupy the" -> "they occupied the"?
what is the "Salonica Front"?
"across the bridge over the Corinth Canal on 28 April to interfere" so was it just for one day or for the broader "early 1917"?
- No, between 28 April and 12 June.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:35, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
link Toulon?

That's it from me- all minor stuff, and open to discussion/disagreement. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 18:24, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for catching all of these; just about all of them needed to be clarified.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:35, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sturmvogel 66, I've spotchecked the sources, to the extent that I can access them, and see no issues with reliability, comprehensiveness, prose, copyvio, and neutrality. Happy to promote- Nice work! Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 23:26, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:44, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]