Talk:French ironclad Héroïne

French ironclad Héroïne has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 31, 2020. (Reviewed version).

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Maritime / European / French

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:French ironclad Héroïne/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 14:25, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indicate in the infobox that the draft figure is at deep load
"The ship displaced between 5,969 metric tons (5,875 long tons)" - The use of between is odd here. It implies there's a second figure in the range, which should be added. If there's not a second figure, remove "between"
Just out of curiosity, is the upper figure in the the complement range for when it was a flagship? Is so, it should probably be indicated.
- You're probably right, but not specified in the sources.
Prose gives conning tower armor as 100 mm, infobox gives 102 mm
Waterline is a duplink
I'm not seeing where the Stenzel and Konstam references listed in the bibliography are used
- Deleted Konstam, Stenzel is referenced in #10. Every once in a while I combine refs when it's too much trouble to sort out which fact goes with which source.
In the Roche ref, (1671-1870) looks like it's part of a volume name. If so, it should be with the volume name, not stuck after the OCLC.
Any chance of an OCLC for Stenzel and Wilson?
Worldcat suggests that Roche is in French, if that's correct, then indicate in the citation

That's it, I believe. Just a little tidying up to do here. Hog Farm _Bacon 16:16, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like I forgot to update the bibliography on this article, n'est-ce pas? Thanks for reviewing this so quickly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:03, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]