Talk:Fuck It Up

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 5 November 2019[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Fuck It Up was created in 2006 as a redirect to the Blood, Sweat and Towers song, but since then, two other songs with the same name have been released. Because of this, I changed Fuck It Up to a disambiguation page to cover all three songs.

I was not aware at that time that the Iggy Azalea song already had an independent article. Since this is the only article with this title, I do not think the disambiguation is necessary. I tried moving it on my own, but I could not. I would greatly appreciate any feedback on this. Thank you in advance! Aoba47 (talk) 13:56, 5 November 2019 (UTC) Relisted. P. I. Ellsworthed. put'r there 19:51, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relist note: this request should stay open seven more days from this relist date because the RMCD bot notice will begin today on the Fuck It Up page. Also, members of the WikiProjects bannered at the top of this talk page have been notified of this request. P. I. Ellsworthed. put'r there 19:58, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. No other article currently on WP needs the title. Station1 (talk) 08:35, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose charted 40 in New Zealand? WP:NOPRIMARY .. Seriously? This song really doesn't deserve to have a standalone article except for completist fans. The base phrase (no pun intended) is worthy of a dab. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:47, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Charting is not the only sign of notability. I think that coverage is a more useful indicator of notability, and this song has gotten some coverage. Aoba47 (talk) 20:53, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment the peak of 40 is for the Hot Singles chart (emphasis mine) not the standard Official New Zealand Music Chart Top 40 Singles Chart. According to Recorded Music NZ's website, Hot Singles are: "The 40 fastest-moving tracks by sales, streams and airplay."[1] Whereas the Official Top 40 Singles are, "The 40 best-selling and most-streamed tracks."[2]shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 00:18, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "Hot Singles Chart". The Official New Zealand Music Chart. Retrieved 16 November 2019.
  2. ^ "NZ Top 40 Singles Chart". The Official New Zealand Music Chart. Retrieved 16 November 2019.
  • That would sound like a good idea to me. Aoba47 (talk) 17:49, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. As the only topic on WP with this name that has an article it should be at the title by default. The only exception would be if other uses, covered in other articles, would be likely enough to be sought by this name to make this a WP:NOPRIMARY situation. But no one has presented any evidence of that. --В²C 22:47, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per WP:SONGDAB unless the other 2 are notable per WP:PRIMARYRED. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:54, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you for the links to the Wikipedia policies on this issue. Aoba47 (talk) 22:06, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.