Talk:Gábor Demszky

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

I wrote a lot to extend it. Honestly, this guy should go, because he never delivered on his promises and been sitting in his chair too long (17 years). But he will not, his 10% lead is enough to win (1 month to go until election) and he has rock solid press support (TV and quality press has liberal focus). There will be no city reform and population will continue to decrease (330.000 left to the agglomeration during his reign, including himself, by now the city shrinked to 1.690.000 instead of 2.050.000 in 1987). That is the reality. I tried to collect positivies about Demszky, but little found. 195.70.32.136 15:53, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually the decreasing of the city's population is a nationwide trend, it might or might not be his fault. But anyway, never ever elect a mayor from SZDSZ. We in Miskolc had one for 8 years and it sucked big time. – Alensha  talk 23:14, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am not the one who marked this item as "neutrality disputed", but I do certainly agree. There is a lot of interesting information, but it is heavily weighed toward critical information, which is given four times as much space as supportive information. Moreover, some of it is purely personal opinion, right from the first sentence of the "Criticism" section: "During the long reign of mayor Demszky, Budapest has transformed in many ways, arguably many for the worse, rather than the better." Says who? I am no fan of Demszky myself, but there is no cite here, and the voters, who have just this weekend re-elected him a fifth successive term, certainly dont appear to agree. The next sentence too: "It is undeniable that Budapest has lost significant appeal in the last decade, while other Central European cities flourish in comparison," is purely personal opinion. Tourism to Budapest has in fact undeniably boomed since the system change-over, and Budapest must be the second most visited city in the former Eastern Bloc. To cite Bratislava as a city that has better "capitalize[d] on tourism" can certainly not be substantiated. Although a resident of Budapest, I do not consider myself qualified to edit this item myself, but it deserves a more factual and balanced rewrite. No-itsme 12:22, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I did add a reference to external links that have the detailed election results of the four elections in which Demszky was re-elected. It took me four or five edits before I got the formatting of the footnote + reference right, sorry about any resulting confusion that may have momentarily occurred. No-itsme 13:42, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree on the non-NPOVness of this article. Your states on the critism section should be sourced. The wording "reign", "princedoms" and "grand duchy" in the context of "said to", etc. are against "Fairness of Tone" - Chromecat 15:16, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The bias of this topic is incredible and clearly supports the conservative view of Fidesz (the main Hungarian opposition party). Even the sources are disputable, because HirTV is a Fidesz sponsored news channel and MNO (Magyar Nemzet Online) is a right-wing daily. What is more is that there are not any other sources listed and the article ridiculously emphasises the personal opinion of the contributor. I would like to see this content removed soon (or modified so that it is objective), because it is extremely unrealistic at the moment and I would even go as far as to say that it might have been written by someone who is closely affiliated with either Fidesz-KDNP or MIÉP. 11:49, 31 October 2006

I totally agree. The "Criticism" section is a disgrace and should be removed in its entirety unless citations can be provided. This may as well be an anti-Gábor Demszky page. If the guy has been elected to his position FIVE times, he must enjoy a certain popularity. I would like to see a balanced view represented here - I have just moved to Budapest and have no political affiliation of my own, but would like to find out some impartial information about my new mayor!Tobycek 18:53, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I cleared most of the criticism section and only left one piece of it (it was citied) and added a different point of view too. I will cite the last sentence in less than a week. The support section was the worse joke I ever read, so it is deleted too. Tobycek If you read some interviews with him you will see that he is devoted to Budapest and want to do everything to improve it (that's what he says, and I have nothing against him that proves otherwise). He has limited funds but I think he makes the best out of it (not to mention how much money he can get from the government itself) Thats my personal view, and I haven't written it in the article, because I can't cite it (yet). Everyone should follow that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kangaxx (talk • contribs) 03:03, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the "neutrality disputed" sign, if noone objects. --Kangaxx (talk) 09:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have reedited and resupplied the article with information. N.11.6 (talk) 17:45, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gábor Demszky. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:12, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Gábor Demszky. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:24, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gábor Demszky. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:28, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gábor_Demszky&oldid=1206931783"