Talk:GNU Compiler for Java

GNU Interpreter for Java was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 21 April 2018 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into GNU Compiler for Java. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Java High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Java, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Java on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JavaWikipedia:WikiProject JavaTemplate:WikiProject JavaJava articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

When did it start?[edit]

Anyone know when GCJ began development?

I'm trying to expand the free Java implementations article and was hoping I'd find the answer here. Gronky 15:14, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GCJ and Swing[edit]

According to gcc.org GCJ doesn't support swing, yet[1]. AWT is said to work mostly --84.156.117.111 (talk) 10:37, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't find even "mostly". I'll cut off that marketroidism to "work is ongoing". Said: Rursus (☻) 07:43, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

??? for MSIL[edit]

What is the name of native compiler for MSIL ? Bartok is for SingSharp (Singularity), not for C#

Criticisms[edit]

Someone in the know should write a section about how much GCJ sucks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Apphacker (talk • contribs) 19:51, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Truly, this is so. It's hard to overstate just how disruptive (and not in a good way) the presence of gcj on default Linux installs has been. Far better to have no java to start with and install a working one than have a broken one preinstalled that one must scrape (like so many runny dog turds) off the system. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.142.107.94 (talk) 20:51, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quote?[edit]

What is with the quote about CNI? It reads like a testimonial, but isn't attributed. The reader wonders who is this "We" that uses CNI? Also, the introduction to CNI seems a bit abrupt. Maybe it could be smoothed out. SlowJog (talk) 14:50, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Project in maintenance mode?[edit]

The article says that this project is in maintenance mode, however the reference does not seem to indicate that, so far as i can tell. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.246.249.209 (talk) 16:26, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think the article is some kind of vague or incomplete, because the page refered to have fewer updates lately. This GCC 4.3 Release Series description page instead tells us: gcj uses Eclipse Java compiler for parsing, making gcj accept Java 1.5 (AKA 5.0) constructions. Maybe the page refd to, reflects that the parsing was suddenly much more mature without the gcj maintainers wiggling their fingers too much. Rursus dixit. (^mbork³!) 20:59, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I found a reference indicating that this "maintenance mode" stuff is an unfounded extrapolation, namely GCJ Status which was last modified Nov 2 2012. I think that the GCJ guys are not just announcement oriented. I'll surf around a little to see what last update really was. Rursus dixit. (^mbork³!) 16:14, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quite wrong. Last gcc series that had Java changes was 4.3. Thereafter nothing. I think maybe gcj lacks maintainers. Rursus dixit. (^mbork³!) 16:45, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on GNU Compiler for Java. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070509055923/http://gcc.gnu.org/java/ to https://gcc.gnu.org/java/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070509055923/http://gcc.gnu.org/java/ to https://gcc.gnu.org/java/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070509055923/http://gcc.gnu.org/java/ to https://gcc.gnu.org/java/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:12, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]