Talk:GWR 4200 Class

Trains: in UK / Locomotives Low‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	September 7, 2008

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Locomotives task force.

This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.

Merger proposal[edit]

GWR 5205 Class to be merged into GWR 4200 Class There seems to be little reason to have the 5205 sub class as a separate page from the 4200 class, and yet not have a separate page for the 5275 sub class. Best to have all three together, especially as by the end many 4200s were upgraded to 5205 or 5275 specification. 212.159.44.170 (talk) 19:05, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Have removed this merger proposal as no comment at all, and it could well be argued that either all the Collett variations on Churchward classes should be mereged into their parents or none of them, and none is less work. 212.159.44.170 (talk) 11:12, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on GWR 4200 Class. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:06, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Minimum Curve Radius[edit]

Minimum Curve radius 2 chains! I think not: that's ridiculous. The very short wheelbase 15xx pannier tank is listed as min radius three chains (Observers book, 1959). Its certainly not listed in the RCTS reference given. A more likely figure I've seen elsewhere is 5 chains, but I haven't seen what I'd call a reliable reference. 212.159.44.170 (talk) 13:01, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Overhaul Complete[edit]

4277 overhaul complete, in traffic as of 21/05/2023 ref image: https://imgur.com/gallery/ba0wgw3 Needs reflecting in table Rileykat21 (talk) 14:09, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please find a reliable source, imgur is user generated. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 21:34, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]