Talk:Ganeshwar

India: Rajasthan Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rajasthan (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in January 2015.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Anthroarchi19. Peer reviewers: Hemlock&cedar.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:34, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Ganeshwar Civilzation" = "Ganeshwar Civilization"[edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

How does one update the article title?Srednuas Lenoroc (talk) 05:47, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Since the article is about Ganeshwar itself, the "civilization" suffix is inappropriate however it's spelled... I have moved the article to the correct title. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:15, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review[edit]

I would like to see more references for the information obtained for the site. There's a whole paragraph with only one citation, which could probably be cited twice. Also, some of the wording and sentence structure seems a little wonky. In particular "Although their principle craft was manufacture of copper objects but they were unable to urbanize" is a little weird, containing some grammar errors. I would also move the final sentence "The copper was obtained in the nearby Aravalli Range." somewhere more relevant.

--AustenTurmel (talk) 05:54, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review[edit]

Your information was concise and did not inundate the reader with information. Maybe check the link for "Ratna Chandra Agrawal", because it contains no information. The citation for reference 6 is missing characters. I don't know if that is something that you can fix on your end, it just looks a little strange. Garebearkiller (talk) 20:23, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Review[edit]

Some added citations about the trade with Harappa would be nice. Kenoyers book 'Ancient cities of the Indus Civilisation'(ISBN:9780195779400) shows the metal trading from the GJCC to the Indus region. Also Uzma Z. Rizvi (the guest lecturer for class) wrote of the trade network for copper and goods from the GJCC in her essay Indices of Interaction: Comparisons between the Ahar-Banas and Ganeshwar Jodhpura Cultural Complex (ISBN: 978 1 4073 0673 5).Hemlock&cedar (talk) 23:40, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]