Talk:Garden Island (New South Wales)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

I don't think it is true that Fleet Base East is known as 'HMAS Kuttabul'. That there is a HMAS Kuttabul in Fleet Base East is no denying. However, where I were a sailor, the ship always docked at "Oil Wharf, Garden Island" or somesuch, not HMAS Kuttabul. HMAS Kuttabul was a shore posting, accomodation for sailors who worked at the base or somewhere nearby (Aust. Theatre HQ, Fleet HQ, or Defence Recruiting Centre in the city, for example). And still to this day, the entrance to the base down at Woolloomooloo is marked as 'Fleet Base East' and if you go up the road to Potts Point you will find 'HMAS Kuttabul'. The Island itself (including the dry dock) is mostly owned and operated by a private defence contractor, Australian Defence Industries, nowadays.


I think you're absolutely right. In fact, Fleet Base East is a variety of separate facilities including the dockyards, the wharves, Kuttabul and HMAS Waterhen. I'm doing a slow re-write of the separate pages for each facility to clean them up and remove confusion and I'm going to tie them into an overarching page for 'Fleet Base East'. To this end I'm going to reduce the reference to HMAS Kuttabul on this Garden Island page as it simply duplicates a lot of what is already on the separate Kuttabul page and just confuses the issue. Stuart midgley (talk) 11:30, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Photograph[edit]

Ed User:Adam.J.W.C. revertion to bad or own photography (WP:BOLD) Hpeterswald (talk) 19:23, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of 'Heritage Items'[edit]

There is a long list of Garden Island heritage items in this article. It seems to have been created with direct HTML rather than using the normal Wikipedia list capabilities. It is not ordered in any way, which breaches the Manual of Style for lists. Does this list belong here at all? Is it relevant to a Wikipedia article? Is it the sort of information that really belongs elsewhere? If yes, should I delete it? If no, how should it be ordered and where in the article should it be placed? I feel like it currently just takes up a lot of space without adding much value. Thoughts and help please! Stuart midgley (talk) 15:25, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Garden Island, New South Wales. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:30, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Update to Proposed future usage[edit]

Judging by the references this section was written around 2013. I added an update needed tag because the information appears to have had no updates since then! 95.145.86.26 (talk) 21:56, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]