Talk:Geelong Ring Road

Australia: Geelong / Transport Low‑importance

	Australia portal Geelong Ring Road is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Geelong (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Australian Roads Mid‑importance

	Australian roads portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Australian Roads, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to roads and highways in Australian states and territories. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Australian RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject Australian RoadsTemplate:WikiProject Australian RoadsAustralia road transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	Victoria
	This article needs a KML file. If it already has one, purge this page, or add \|needs-kml=no to the WikiProject Australian Roads banner.

Section 4[edit]

Where is section 4?, section 4 should be included as well! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 58.168.57.62 (talk) 09:02, 4 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

A10[edit]

What is the source for Princes Highway's A10? --Sk-4 (talk) 05:07, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

VicRoads Geelong Ring Road Project office confirmed Princes Highway through Geelong will we re-numbered A10 on the opening of Section 3 of the Ring Road (19-12-08). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.130.9.194 (talk) 01:12, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

video of stage 1 and 2, southbound being opened to the general public.[edit]

http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=vVgZmHvyCj8 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.208.181.69 (talk) 10:34, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced criticism[edit]

The Criticism section was greatly expanded on many months ago and includes many claims that remain unsourced. Might be worth trimming it if no sources can be found. Thedangerouskitchen (talk) 21:25, 24 January 2010 (UTC) Agree, it reads like the rants of someone who is annoyed they built the road near his house —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.253.47.9 (talk) 05:30, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This newspaper article from 2002 below covers some of the criticism topics https://www.facebook.com/geelonghistory/photos/pcb.587085424830030/587085394830033/?type=3&theater — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.32.228.253 (talk) 23:17, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This newspaper article from 1991 below covers some of the criticism topics https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=1749723538856345&set=pcb.1814376125665791 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.214.51.47 (talk) 04:11, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

More Geelong Advertiser articles discusing thering road vs bay bridge debate prior to construction. https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=1751550032007029&set=pcb.1816219558814781 https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=1751550025340363&set=pcb.1816219558814781 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.214.51.47 (talk) 22:43, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Trouble archiving links on the article[edit]

Hello. I am finding myself repeatedly archiving links on this page. This usually happens when the archive doesn't recognize the archive to be good.

This could be because the link is either a redirect, or I am unknowingly archiving a dead link. Please check the following links to see if it's redirecting, or in anyway bad, and fix them, if possible.

In any event this will be the only notification in regards to these links, and I will discontinue my attempts to archive these pages.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:30, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Geelong Ring Road. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120226035216/http://www.geelongadvertiser.com.au/article/2008/04/29/13444_news.html to http://www.geelongadvertiser.com.au/article/2008/04/29/13444_news.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:57, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Geelong Ring Road. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:07, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Geelong Ring Road. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:15, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Geelong Ring Road. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:17, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]