Talk:Gender identity under Title IX

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Since the case is already settled and there is no scope for any expansion of the article's text, a selective merge (of relevant part or a summary) of Dallas School District locker room controversy to Litigation section on this page seems rational. - Harsh (talk) 08:58, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  checkY Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 07:53, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Review For Class Project[edit]

I thought the lead section of the article was clear and easy to understand. It gave a good brief overview of the article. The structure of the article was clear and followed the timeline of events well. I think it could be broken down into another paragraph to avoid the large block of text, but it is not necessary. The content was unbiased and well written, although I think it could be condensed down some, the tone reads more like a story rather than an article. The sources were all refutable, quality sources but source 72, the Transgender Student article, is now unavailable.Mollie.Bach (talk) 06:45, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Religious exemption from Title IX: consequences for LGBT+ students[edit]

Hey, I can't find any overview of how any religious school can be exempt from a Title IX provision, if the school is able to prove the provision conflicts with a specific tenet of their religious institution. This exemption deserves to be noted in this article, as it's allowed American higher education to discriminate against LGBTQ+ students while continuing to receive federal funding. I'm reading up on the issue and intend to edit this article to include it soon. EatDust?Pls (talk) 22:05, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]