Talk:General Electric CJ805

Aft fan?

File:RB-66A (52-2828) with CJ805 test engines.JPG is described in this article as having the -23 aft fan turbofan engines. They aren't visible, and the nacelle art simply describes them as "Turbojet"s.

Whilst this same aircraft was probably used as a test aircraft for the turbofan, I think this photo shows it in some earlier configuration, testing the basic CJ805 turbojet. The caption should be changed and the article text clarified. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:03, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Definitely. The fan version had a notably bigger cowl, and the paint was different - most notable was that the pylon was no longer painted black. The overall scheme was similar, but still different enough to tell at a glance. Maury Markowitz (talk) 01:05, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Variable compressor stator vanes?

The great innovation of the J79 was the use of movable stator vanes in the compressor, despite their complexity and cost. Did the CJ805 use these too? Or had they been simplified away? Andy Dingley (talk) 15:04, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

@Andy Dingley: Just noticed this now. Yes, the 805 did retain the variable inlets, Flight mentions this and you can see the cam arms here. It looks like they changed as little as possible, even though you wouldn't really need them in the later stages in the purely subsonic role. 14:27, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on General Electric CJ805. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110203000321/http://www.geae.com/engines/military/j79/index.html to http://www.geae.com/engines/military/j79/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:44, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned references in General Electric CJ805

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of General Electric CJ805's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "JAWA1959-60":

• From List of aircraft engines: Bridgman, Leonard, ed. (1959). Jane's all the World's Aircraft 1959–60. London: Sampson Low, Marston & Co. Ltd.
• From Boeing T50: Bridgman, Leonard, ed. (1959). Jane's all the World's Aircraft 1959–60. London: Sampson Low, Marston & Co. Ltd. pp. 521–522.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 20:28, 24 December 2017 (UTC)