Talk:Germain Grisez

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Philosophy: Philosophers Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophers

POV problems[edit]

Much of the content of this article looks as though it was written to present Grisez in as favorable a light as possible - it's material that in effect states that Grisez's views are correct and that his work is wonderful. Perhaps they are and perhaps it is, but a neutral encyclopedia shouldn't be implying that even if it happens to be true. Note that I'm not accusing anyone of deliberately introducing bias here - only stating that frankly it comes across as strongly biased. I'm therefore reducing this article down to a bare minimum of content, which seems the best option in terms of both BLP and NPOV. Hopefully in future the article can be rebuilt, using proper secondary sources. UserVOBO (talk) 07:26, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am leaving Wikipedia for good, but I'd like to note (in this, my final edit ever) that I am glad that I reverted UserVOBO's vandalism. Conservative Philosopher (talk) 06:01, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

UserVOBO's edits were done according to WP policies - they removed non-WP:RSed and WP:PEACOCK material (and were thus not WP:VANDALISM). AV3000 (talk) 11:54, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]