Talk:Gift Aid

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Bias[edit]

Is there any information about the controversies regarding gift aid? I do not understand it fully but if someone signs a gift aid declaration and then doesn't pay enough to cover the tax claimed back THEY are liable to pay it. 'The donor must pay at least as much UK tax (Income Tax and/or Capital Gains Tax) as the amount of Income Tax that you’ re reclaiming. If a donor makes a number of Gift Aid donations, including to other charities and CASCs, they must pay a sufficient amount of UK tax on the total amount of those donations and they may be required to pay any shortfall in tax paid to HMRC' from http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/charities/gift_aid/basics.htm#4

Also http://www.thirdsector.co.uk/Finance/article/1116452/tax-adviser-jailed-70m-gift-aid-fraud/ about gift aid fraud and 'CHARITIES are fleecing millions of pounds from taxpayers by fraudulently claiming Gift Aid, it has been revealed. HMRC said it has detected fraudulent gift aid claims from charities totalling more than £10m' http://www.thirdforcenews.org.uk/2012/07/charities-commit-gift-aid-fraud-says-hmrc/ and http://www.civilsociety.co.uk/fundraising/news/content/13054/fraudulent_gift_aid_claims_from_charities_top_20m_in_two_years_says_hmrc says £20m in 2 years.

Also this article is good about the cons of gift aid http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2010/jan/30/gift-aid-hidden-catch#start-of-comments

Sweetie candykim (talk) 18:12, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Gift Aid/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

==WP Tax Class==

Start class because needs expansion on impact and history. Also, it could use more references.EECavazos 20:09, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

==WP Tax Priority==

Mid priority because important in a single country. Could go higher if the article conveys that the subject is of greater importance in its country than it currents lets on.EECavazos 20:10, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 20:10, 3 November 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 16:15, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Revenue to HMRC section.[edit]

Poorly titled, poorly worded, poorly laid out. Let's delete this, eh? As an erstwhile accountant, I gotta say that this section is virtually unintelligible. Boscaswell talk 15:54, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I can't follow it either. What is "this transaction"? Why bring NIC into it? --Redactur (talk) 11:44, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gift Aid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:55, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]