Talk:Gilthas

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gilthas redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Dungeons & Dragons

This redirect is within the scope of the Dungeons & Dragons WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dungeons & Dragons-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, or join the discussion, where you can join the project and find out how to help!Dungeons & DragonsWikipedia:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsTemplate:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsDungeons & Dragons articles

D&D to-do:

view

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Merge : Various articles
Stubs : Dungeoneer's Survival Guide, Swords & Spells, Variant Dungeons & Dragons games, More...
Update : Rewrite to be out-of-universe: Companions of the Hall, Dark Sun, Elf (Dungeons & Dragons)
Verify : add sources to novels planned for merge to List of Dragonlance novels
Other : Collaboration: Dave Arneson, Drow (Dungeons & Dragons)

Fictional characters

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Moving[edit]

I suggest moving this page to Gilthas, as it is the most common name of this character. -- ReyBrujo 02:59, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would agree. Done. ddcc 03:53, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

tense[edit]

Shouldn't this article be in past tense? Randfan 02:53, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

According to the fictional guidelines, articles about fictional events should be narrated in present. -- ReyBrujo 03:33, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yup. A lot of the stuff I originally wrote was in past tense, it's something I really should fix up...one of these days. Dooms Day349 03:41, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. It's just that in the books (that I've read) it's in past. So I figured the article should be in past, too. —Rand fan !! 15:49, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just want to put my two cents in here. I understand that the Wikipedia has rules, and blah blah. The current timeline, as set down by the Solamnia Trilogy is 427 AC on Krynn. Techinically speaking, the new elven series, and even MW's new trilogy are in the past even though they are new books. Oh, and don't forget Gilthas information from KoD, SoS, and PoC (which is out now).--Kranar drogin 16:31, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To Kranar; yeah, I understand that. DL time always has me confused. Also, I advise not to use abbreviations like KoD and whatnot, an explanation of those would be nice. But anyway, Wikipedia policy says all fictional articles should be in present tense, as everything is currently happening, technically. Dooms Day349 16:33, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, Key of Destiny, Spectre of Sorrow, and Price of Courage. When talking, I am used to the boards where it gets tiring always having to write out the names. Oh, and those books are references for Gilthanas, my bad. Posting my own articles and reading when you all wrote, get confused sometimes. ;) --Kranar drogin 17:25, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Understandable :). I like to use abbreviations sometimes as well, but it's hard to remember I'm on Wikipedia, not the boards. Dooms Day349 18:18, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]